Clinical outcome of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion using cannulated screw and humeral proximal locking plate inverted fixation through a lateral transfibular approach / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the clinical outcome of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion using cannulated screw and humeral proximal locking plate inverted fixation through a lateral transfibular approach.@*METHODS@#From June 2015 to December 2018, 15 patients underwent a tibiotalocalcaneal fusion operation using cannulated screw and inverted proximal humerus locking plate through a transfibular approach. There were 10 males and 5 females with the age ranging from 45 to 72 (58.9±6.1) years, and the course of disease ranged from 2 to 35 (11.9±7.9)years. Preoperative diagnosis included 8 cases of post traumatic arthritis, 2 cases of Charcot arthritis, 2 cases of Charcot-Marie -Tooth (CMT), 1 case of ankle tuberculosis, 1 case of talar necrosis, and 1 case of pigmented villonnodular synovitis. Among them, 8 patients were combined with simple varus deformity, 4 patients with simple valgus deformity, 2 patients with equinovarus deformity, 1 patient with equinovarus deformity, 2 patients with adduction and internal rotation of middle and forefoot. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score were used to evaluate the clinical outcome at the last follow up.@*RESULTS@#One lost follow up and remaining fourteen patients were followed up. The follow up time ranged from 10 to 25(16.6±4.3) months. All the 15 patients had primary healing. Fusion time ranged from 15 to 24 (16.8 ± 2.4) weeks after operation. One patient with diabetes experienced delayed union and was successfully treated with secondary bone grafting combined with Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injection. The AOFAS score increased from 38.7±3.3 to 84.5±2.6 (@*CONCLUSION@#Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion used cannulated screw and humeral proximal locking plate inverted fixation through a lateral transfibular approach has the advantages of relatively simple technique, high fusion rate, especially for patients with posterior foot deformity, which has satisfactory short term effects.

Chevron osteotomy versus Scarf osteotomy for the efficacy of radiographic and clinical in moderate and severe hallux valgus:a systematic review / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate efficacy of radiographic and clinical of Chevron osteotomy versus Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus at moderate and severe degree.@*METHODS@#Randomized controlled trial (RCT) about Chevron and Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus, in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang Data were searched by computer from establishing database to June 2018. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently screened the literatures, evaluated risk of bias and extracted related observation index, RevMan 5.3.5 software was used to perform Meta-analysis. Postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), AOFAS score, complications and patients' satisfaction degree between Chevron and Scarf osteotomy.@*RESULTS@#Six RCT literatures were included, involving 507 patients, 92.5% patients were at moderate and severe degree, and 261 patients were performed by Chevron osteotomy and 246 patients were performed by Scarf osteotomy. Meta analysis results showed that Chevron osteotomy was better than Scarf osteotomy in correcting HVA [MD=-1.95, 95%CI(-2.64, -1.27), <0.000 01]. While there were no statistical differences in IMA [MD=-0.42, 95%CI(-1.04, 0.21), =0.19], DMAA[MD=0.78, 95%CI(-0.72, 2.29), =0.31], AOFAS score [MD=2.47, 95%CI(-2.38, 7.33), =0.32], complications [RR=1.09, 95%CI(0.54, 2.20), =0.82], and patients' satisfaction degree [RR=1.00, 95%CI(0.96, 1.05), =0.92].@*CONCLUSIONS@#Chevron osteotomy, which has advantages in simple operation, shorten metatarsal bone, less trauma, was better in correcting HVA of hallux valgus at moderate and severe degree, and had similar effects in IMA, DMAA, AOFAS score, complications and patients' satisfactory degree.

Research progress on total ankle replacement / 中国骨伤

Total ankle replacement (TAR) is considered as a treatment option for end stage ankle arthritis. This treatment was abandoned due to the early failure prosthesis in the past. However, with recently advancements in ankle prosthesis design and improved surgical techniques, TAR has made great progress and the indications are expanding. Many studies have shown acceptable mid term and long term results of TAR, and it is worth looking forward to the prospect. Advantages of TAR over arthrodesis include improvement in joint range of motion, better gait activity, and decreased incidence of adjacent joint arthritis. With the further development, TAR will be considered as gold standard for the treatment of end stage ankle arthritis instead of the ankle arthrodesis. However, there are still many problems of TAR need to be solved in this present stage of development, including higher economic costs, lower survival rate, and higher revision rate. Patients and surgeons should have confidence in TAR, also need to choose this treatment with careful consideration.